A Stomach-Turning Revelation Straight from the Epstein Files

In a revelation that turns the stomach of anyone who values integrity in public office, Delegate Stacey Plaskett, the non-voting Democratic representative from the Virgin Islands, was caught red-handed exchanging real-time text messages with notorious sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 House Oversight hearing. As disgraced Trump fixer Michael Cohen testified, Epstein—already a convicted predator at that point—was feeding Plaskett tips on how to squeeze more damaging names out of the witness, and she eagerly followed his lead, interrupting Cohen to demand he "quickly give us as many names as you can so we can get to them." All while staring down at her phone, apparently prioritizing whispers from a child sex offender over the gravity of a congressional proceeding aimed at smearing political opponents.

Not Some Innocent Constituent Chat—This Was Real-Time Coaching from a Monster

This wasn't some innocent constituent outreach, as Plaskett's flimsy defenses now claim. Epstein complimented her outfit, asked if she was chewing gum like a nervous schoolgirl, and even patted her on the back with a smug "Good work" after she parroted his suggested lines. Yet here we are in 2025, days after these explosive documents surfaced from Epstein's estate, and the Democratic Party machine is operating in full cover-up mode. Crickets from the usual outrage merchants who leap at any whiff of scandal involving Republicans. No thunderous denunciations from the likes of Rep. Robert Garcia or the Oversight Democrats, who once reveled in weaponizing Cohen's vendetta-fueled testimony against Trump. Where are the statements? Where is the righteous fury they reserve for digging through decades-old yearbooks or anonymous allegations?

Hypocrisy That Burns Brighter Than Little St. James

The hypocrisy burns brighter than Epstein's infamous island parties—all while Democrats clutch pearls over associations that pale in comparison. Plaskett, whose district conveniently encompassed Epstein's lair of horrors, had long accepted his tainted donations and maintained contact even after his 2008 conviction and the Miami Herald's damning exposés. She only distanced herself when the heat became unbearable, donating the money to charities in a classic damage-control pivot. But accepting real-time coaching from this monster during an official hearing, using his "advice" to chase partisan ghosts? That's not just poor judgment; it's a glaring window into how far some in the Democratic ranks will go to shield their own while hurling stones at everyone else.

The Party-Wide Gag Order Tells You Everything

And the party-wide gag order on this? It's telling. Leaders like Hakeem Jeffries dodge questions, Jamie Raskin spins it as a mere "phone call from a constituent" (as if Epstein were just some concerned voter dropping baking tips), and the caucus circles the wagons to block even a censure vote. They know the Epstein files hold more landmines for their side—ties that run deep in Virgin Islands politics and beyond. This silence isn't oversight; it's orchestrated protection for one of their own, proving once again that Democratic demands for "accountability" evaporate the moment the spotlight swings their way.

If Democrats Actually Stood Against Epstein's Horrors, They'd Be Screaming—But They're Not

If Democrats truly stood against the Epstein nightmare, they'd be leading the charge to condemn Plaskett's reckless entanglement, not burying it under layers of deflection and excuses. Their refusal to speak out isn't loyalty—it's complicity in sweeping uncomfortable truths under the rug. The American people deserve better than a party that preaches transparency while practicing selective amnesia on their own sordid connections. How many more days of radio silence before they realize the cover-up is always worse than the crime?